Executives Need More Role-Playing, Less Storytelling

“If you get a chance to act in a room that somebody else has paid rent for, then you’re given a free chance to practice your craft.”

– Phillip Seymour Hoffman

I have worked in storytelling for decades. From Emmy award winning shows written in LA to a YouTube video about a baby shark that had 2 Billion views.

Across media and entertainment, I have seen how a strong story can create attention, build affinity and help people remember an idea. Stories do matter. They help us make sense of complexity and turn information into something people can feel.

Yet many executives spend too much time trying to become better storytellers when their more immediate need is to become better role-players.

By role-playing, I mean the ability to understand the part you are being asked to play in a particular moment, then perform it with clarity and conviction.

A CEO needs to play the role of steady decision-maker when the business is under pressure. A leader presenting a difficult change needs to play the role of translator, turning an abstract strategy into what it means for people’s work and future. A new executive needs to play the role of peer in a room full of more established colleagues, without shrinking or overcompensating.

Many leaders enter an important meeting focused on their content:

1. What do I want to say?
2. What is the story?
3. What slides or data do I need?

Those questions are useful, but incomplete.

Before the meeting, here’s a better question to ask: What does this room need from me?

It may need reassurance. It may need a challenge. It may need a clear decision or permission to speak honestly about something people have avoided.

The executive’s task is to read that need and meet it.

This is why two people can deliver the same message with very different results. One speaks with the right words and still loses the room. The other makes a difficult message feel understandable and manageable.

Role-playing requires range.

A founder cannot speak to employees, investors, customers and the board in exactly the same way. The underlying truth should remain consistent. The role changes because each audience has a different relationship to the decision, different fears and a different level of context.

The most memorable executives can shift without becoming unrecognizable.

They know when to be the strategist and when to be the operator. When to be candid and when to be calming. When to make space for debate and when to close it down with a decision.

This takes self-awareness. It also takes preparation.

Before a significant conversation, consider asking these questions:

  • What is my role in this room?

  • What does the audience need to leave with?

  • What might be something they are thinking, and not saying directly?

  • Where do I need to show certainty?

  • Where would curiosity or humility serve the conversation better?

These questions change how you prepare, and move the focus from delivering a polished message to creating the conditions for a useful outcome.

Actors rehearse scenes constantly. Great executives should do more of the same.

Role-play the sceptical board member. Role-play the employee who feels overlooked. Role-play the client who thinks the proposal is too expensive. Role-play the senior colleague who will challenge your numbers in front of everyone.

The purpose is to build familiarity with pressure, sharpen your responses and notice the habits that emerge when you feel exposed.

Many leaders over-explain. They soften their recommendation. They fill silence. They become defensive when questioned.

You cannot always see these patterns by thinking about them. Instead, you see them when someone puts you in the scene.

Previous
Previous

Is Original Thinking Statistically Rare?

Next
Next

Do you have a Setup?